
Friday, 5 February 2010
Black!

Wednesday, 3 February 2010
The Germans have gone mad!

It said that the Germans decided that they wouldn't allow alpaca's which have been imported to Europe after 1-1-2009 because of TB-problems.
-------------------------------------
Well, see the former article on this blog: "TB or not TB" for my opinion.
We don't have any NZ-Alpacas. But I think this measurements aren't helping.... TB is a hype in Germany, Belgium and The Netherlands. England has a serious problem at the moment....
------------------------------------------------
President
Alpaka Zucht Verband Deutchland e V.
Ickinger Strasse 8a
D-82335
Berg-Morlbach
Germany
info@alpakazuchtverband.de
Herbert Ruch
Chairman
Alpaka Association eV
Talstrasse 52
72532 Gomadingen-Wasserstetten
Germany
info@alpacaassociation.com
Dear President/Chairman
We have been advised by some of your concerned members that you have introduced a rule - ostensibly for health (Tb) reasons - that farms that have imported alpacas from New Zealand since 1/1/2009 will be excluded from German Shows.
As the industry representative body in New Zealand this gives us a great deal of concern – especially as you are implying a Tb concern with New Zealand alpacas – where there is no concern to express.
Here are some facts about NZ alpacas and Tb in this country. It is a shame you did not bother to research these facts (or talk to us) before making your decision.
1) New Zealand Government is the most pro-active in the world regarding Tb control and eradication.
2) AANZ has run a voluntary Tb testing and notification scheme (in parallel to Government schemes for cattle and deer) since 1998.
3) In that time many thousand alpacas have been tested clear of Tb each year, on an annual basis.
4) In these 12 years we have had 2 isolated breakdowns. Both in small pet herds who had chosen not to participate in the scheme. One (early in the life of the scheme) was a single alpaca whose Tb was encapsulated. The second (6 years ago) was 2 alpacas in an untested herd (i.e. not part of the scheme) from an endemic Tb area. In both these cases the Tb was contracted from wild vector population and there was no spread to other alpacas in the same herd/paddock or to other farms.
5) Tb is a notifiable disease in NZ and all vets are obligated to advise the Government upon suspicion of Tb. No advice has been made except for the two old cases noted above.
6) All AANZ members are requested to lodge post mortem findings with the Association. There have been never been any post mortem lodged that report Tb.
7) All alpacas exported from New Zealand come from clear herds under the voluntary Tb scheme - so have been regularly tested through their lives for Tb and proven clear.
8) All alpacas exported from New Zealand have been Tb tested by MAF (our government biosecurity agency) whilst in isolation for export. This EU dictated testing is to a more rigid test than our voluntary scheme and is designed to filter out even the slightest suspect sign of Tb – be it the dangerous bovine Tb or the innocuous avian Tb.
9) In recent years we are not aware of a single alpaca refused export because of Tb concerns, and many hundred alpacas are exported each year from New Zealand.
10) No UK case of Tb has implicated NZ sourced alpacas.
So you can see your ban does not reflect the actual Tb situation in NZ. It is also is contrary to the EU rules on import of alpacas into Germany.
We have a few questions concerning the background to this ban.
1) Have there been any cases of Tb in alpaca in Germany? We understand not.
2) Have any of these cases involved alpaca imported recently from NZ? We understand not.
3) The AAev letter to members refers to consulting with experts in affected countries. We wish to know whom you consulted in New Zealand about this before deciding to discriminate against New Zealand alpacas?
We would also comment that your ban does not make a lot of sense when viewed from a bio-security point of view.
1) As above, alpacas imported to Germany have been tested clear for Tb to EU standards prior to import.
2) Tb is present in Peru and Chile, and the same import tests are done, yet these countries are not included in your ban.
3) Australian alpacas pass through NZ for 6 months prior to export to Europe, so Australian alpacas would carry the same perceived risk and should be banned also – but are not.
4) Imported alpacas you consider to be at risk cannot go to shows - but are free to mingle with German alpacas at other events, do mobile matings and meet up in other circumstances. Hardly a true isolation situation. If you were serious about this being a health concern you would need to totally isolate these farms.
In general Tb is a disease which
Comes from a domestic source, not an imported one. I note that the literature refers to cases of Tb still existing in cattle in Germany - despite Germany supposedly being officially Tb free.
Is usually from wild animal vector contact, only very rarely from alpaca to alpaca contact (although that possibility does exist and has been recorded in the UK in a small minority of their cases).
In NZ, AANZ has set rules around shows that ensure that alpacas can only go to shows if they come from a herd that is independently Tb tested regularly in line with the AANZ voluntary Tb scheme, and if that herd is tested clear from Tb. We have no problems with alpaca exhibitors, or cattle exhibitors with this rule.
We suggest that instead of your rather broad brush ban, you should consider a similar scheme to the one we use to provide bio-security at your shows.
It would be simple for purchasers of alpacas from NZ to request a copy of the selling herd Government Certificate of Tb Herd Clearance which can be presented to German Show organisers along with entry forms.
This will prove long term seller herd Tb clearance, and – along with the MAF tests on export - should give you more than adequate evidence that NZ alpacas imported into Germany are absolutely Tb free.
In summary we believe your rule
1) Unfairly discriminates against some of your breeders. Whether this is legally enforceable in Germany is between you and your breeders. It would not be in New Zealand.
2) does not achieve its goal – if its goal is indeed a health one
3) is contradictory to EU regulations on import of alpacas
4) damages the reputation of New Zealand alpacas unfairly (which is our main concern as the National representative body of New Zealand breeders)
We request you cease such a rule in relation to NZ alpacas with immediate effect to avoid us taking more serious rectification measures. And consider the alternative suggested by us above.
Finally let us say that in our experience Tb is an emotive subject, and one which can get uninformed breeders highly agitated very quickly.
It is the absolute responsibility of representative Alpaca Associations around the world to try to avoid such emotive response, and to handle the Tb subject with full knowledge of the facts, dissemination of such facts, and rules that work well and properly address the problem.
We are not convinced that Germany does have a Tb problem at present. If you do we are happy to offer our NZ expertise in camelid Tb (probably the longest established expertise available in the world) to assist you in putting together an effective Tb monitoring and control programme across your alpaca population.
We look forward to the withdrawal of your current ruling. We suggest you refer to more facts coming to hand that you were not aware of previously.
We remain happy to provide you with more information should you need it.
Kind Regards,
Kate Mander
President, AANZ
(Alpaca Association of New Zealand)
Mail the alpaca-vet
Saturday, 30 January 2010
Typical Dutch!

Sunday, 24 January 2010
TB or not TB

Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis in cattle is mostly caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium (M.) bovis. To fight this bacteria is hard because it lives both intra- and extracellular (not all antibiotics reach the intracellular level. Next to this the bacteria is able to mutate (change) quickly, effective antibiotics are suddenly useless. The bacteria has turned resistant to the antibiotic used by us.
Netherlands
The Netherlands is still officially free of tuberculosis. This doesn’t mean that imported animals aren’t a threat. But these animals are being found by “track and trace’ and destroyed (including animals that have been in contact with these animals). Further spread of M. Bovis is prevented by these measurements.
Alpacas
The danger of alpacas is actually the screening (skin) test (obliged when importing an alpaca) used to identify a bTB infection This test isn’t sensitive and specific enough for alpacas (and certain other animalspecies). This means that there will be false-negative results (false-positive doesn’t seem to happen that much in alpacas). An alpaca does have the M. Bovis bacteria but the test isn’t showing it. This fact could be very harmful for our alpacaherd.
The best test to diagnose TB in your alpaca is a chest X-ray . Laesions in the lungs are found in an early stage.
Laboratoria are trying to develop a bloodtest that recognises specific DNA-material (PCR-test) of the M. Bovis bacteria. So far with unsatisfactory results.
How is bTB spread?
In southern England bTB is a major problem. The badgerpopulation seems to be infected with TB and badgers are thriving well in the UK. New infections take place because of badgers roaming around the area. Different actions are being proposed to deal with the infected badgerpopulation, from vaccination of all badgers (sounds impossible) to shooting badgers to halt the spread of TB.
When the infection is worsening in an animal, inflammatory lesions (tubercle) are being formed in the lungs. When these lesions burst the bacteria is free to leave the animal through the airway (coughing). The environment is infected and another animal can pick up the bacteria. This is the main infectionroute, but the bacteria is also excreted through faeces.
An infected animal isn’t a sick animal. The bacteria can hide itself (latent infection). It may take months before an animals shows any symptoms, usually when the animal is in a stressful situation (labor, transport, show, parasitic infection etc).
In cattle the tuberculinationskintest is usually positive when an animal has been in contact with M. Bovis (no illness symptoms necessary). Unfortunately it doesn’t work that good in alpacas. Too many false negative results.
bTB symptoms
Symptoms aren’t shown till the illness is in its last stage. What symptoms and the severity depends on location of the inflammatory lesions. And usually very aspecific.
Weightloss and a hard dry cough (if the lungs are severely damaged), but this doesn’t mean it is TB. Lots of other diseases can cause these symptoms as well.
Further diagnosis by X-rays in living animals to check on tubercles in the lungs. Or autopsy is necessary to diagnose cause of death.
Therapy and prevention
As mentioned before the bacteria can settle itself intracellular. Rifampicine and possible enrofloxacine (both antibiotics) are suitable to treat tuberculosis. BUT treatment is longlasting (6 months) and therefore very expensive. And there is no guarantee the animal will recover and how much scarring tissue is present in the lungs (this is irreversible). In the Netherlands it is not allowed to treat animals, they should be destroyed (because of the bTB free status). In the UK it is possible to start a treatment when an alpaca is diagnosed or suspected of bTB. As in the Netherlands, alpacas in the UK aren’t qualified as livestock. This means that the livestock law doesn’t include the alpaca.
The author’s opinion is that the dutch regulating authorities aren’t experienced enough with this bTB in alpacas and it misapplies the EU legislation concerning this matter.
For me it doesn’t seem wise to let bTB animals alive. Positive X-rays next to positive tuberculination test should mean putting the animal down as soon as possible and have it autopsied.
When positively diagnosed (culture / Ziehl Neelsen staining), all animals on the farm should be X-rayed. All positive animals should be euthanased to prevent further spreading.
De stalls of the contaminated farm should be cleaned and disinfected on a regularly basis.
If need be heat treatment or UV-radiation, ethanol 70% or formaldehyde to fight the bacteria in the surroundings.
A notification?
Tuberculosis in alpacas is a notifiable contagious disease because of the danger to people (zoonosis). At the moment there is no registered TB skintest with a correct expiration date available (see authors own experiences with the TB skintest of the government!). The government itself is thereby in violation of applying a correct TB skintest. As previously mentioned, the Netherlands is officially free of bTB.
Advice & Discussion
Autopsy should always be performed on a dead alpaca, especially when symptoms included weightloss, respiratory problems and fever.
View Author
Because of the Dutch free bTB-status it is clear that bTB in the Dutch cattlepopulation hardly plays a role here in the Netherlands. But alpaca owners should be aware of the risks of importing alpacas (especially from higher risk areas). And the owners should act responsible towards the whole alpaca herd and human health by reporting sick, of bTB suspected animals and perform autopsy on animals that have died on the premises.
The only just method to protect your herd against bTB is X-rays. In an attempt to detect the disease as early as possible and fight the bacteria.
Animals attending a show should be stationed per region, to prevent further spreading throughout the country. Closed fencing to avoid direct contact between animals from different breeders and minimize a chance of bTB spreading
For now the risk of bTB in the Netherlands seems no issue. Especially, because the slaughter line of cattle is continuously monitored (not alpacas, this should be our own responsibility as a breeder).
Leo J.H. van Merwijk – DVM
Bata4en – Animal Hospital
www.bata4en.nl
www.dierenarts-en-alpaca.blogspot.com
www.alpacasofthelowlands.com
Wednesday, 20 January 2010
Sunday, 3 January 2010
Happy new year

Sunday, 15 November 2009
HCT ok!

Thursday, 12 November 2009
Pathalogic results of Wasaki


New fleece samples of our studs
Lysander - 16.77 micron SD 4.3
Claudius - 21.4 micron SD 4.3
Claudius is a black male, sun of Canchoness Witness.
Super results for second fleeces...
Mail the alpaca-vet
Monday, 9 November 2009
A lot has happened since the last message...
A flashback..., no not the alpacastud Flashback!
A few good cria were born last month. No problems what so-ever...
Healthproblems or buying alpacas? Ask us - FREE ADVICE!
Our adress:
Bata4en - Animal Clinic
Enggraaf 22 - 24
4175 ER Haaften
0031 (0) 418 – 591302 (monday to friday)
0031 (0) 6 - 51164000 (cellphone - weekends)
You can reach us by email info@bata4en.nl
